If you prepared your mother's favorite lunch, and when I went to school I saw him destitute people does not have a price for his food, what will you doing?
- Will I share my food.
- Would not tell him to have only a job, or my exposure to him a loan of 6%, or Sttjahlainh completely?
- No I will not do that, of course !.
- Well, I've become a small communist.
Hollywood muzzles mouths of their stars
«Brian Cranston» presented in the film Trumbo elaborate role of screenwriter «Dalton Trumbo» and who was imprisoned because of their political orientation, in the film «Jay Roach» directed by sincere impartially to monitor important era of American history, a period in which power the Communists shadowed in the fifties of the last century, so I decided Studios Hollywood voluntarily to purify their labor, who belongs to the Communist Party; courting them to the monitoring Committee of the Communist activities set up by Congress during the cold war between the two superpowers, so that Dmthm to the blacklist, which prevented them later work Bholyod forever; respond to the scene of the popular fearsome charged punctuated with shame both prove his allegiance to the Communist party, after the Committee also hired witnesses from inside the corridors to report colleagues preserved to save face and avoid prosecution.
«Dalton Trumbo» has occupied the forefront Kochehr victims known trial of Hollywood stars ten the case, where it was at the time one of the most talented writers and artistic richness and abundance, as well as being one of the most prominent members of the Communist Party. Trumbo has refused to cooperate with the investigation and underestimated by Vodanth charges of rubber which is contempt of Congress, along with nine other celebrities were all imprisoned for a period of one tenth in 1950, months, and then was forced after leaving that manages things living have several scenarios hidden behind pseudonyms, even managed insisting that his talent and imposed itself despite the blocking of Hollywood put themselves in a ridiculous position; and that when he won two Oscars for his films scenarios Roman holiday and the Brave One.
This Alheiestirih against the Khmer People's fever broke neutralize Finally after the Brilliant Star with «Kirk Douglas insisted that puts Trumbo name as a writer film« Stanley Kubrick »epic Spartacus scenario, which Douglas Ovichath issued a hero and executive producer in 1960, while it seems that he wrote the end line for a period of appalling disgraceful of American history; where there is no longer after this era who can prove that the film industry has become swerving to the right or left clearly, as it was easy to guess earlier. Valjder mentioning that Trumbo was not held accountable for his creativity; Vsanaryohath itself was more like a mixture of writings conservative, liberal-leaning hidden like any other writer lived during that time.
Roles homogeneous and successful choices
As for the heroes of the film «Bryan Cranston» has given to the role of each and giving the elaborately performance, earned through filtration Alooscara; where hired Authority Trumbo dude famous Kalsharb thick holder cigar and a glass of whiskey that did not die of his hands and supplies, while played «Helen Mirren» a good role as one of the most important journalists Hollywood, which was more like a Bassahrh evil came from the American West to pour on the reds for the curses, the blown up in their faces and their toxins Nmimitha journalistic reputations in the cup. «Michael Stalberg» also acted as a remarkable representative of the leftist «Edward Robinson» and which has been reluctant to himself after his colleagues Wuxi to the commission of inquiry in order to protect his name in Hollywood after being pressed by producers.
While it was the only performance of lower quality than the share comedian «Louis CK», which played the role of the fighter X «Arlene Hurd» friend Trumbo permanent agitation him, because he likes the toughness stubborn curiosities; where the performance was not quite processions of Cranston, but it seemed closer to what to play on the famous father Stand Comedy Theater program presenting him.
Who is responsible for the film's success; scenario or output?
But it is known that making a film talks about the scriptwriter talented Ktrambo puts a big responsibility on screenwriter «John McNamara», which helped him biography Trumbo rich a lot of events until it drew the best movie scenes between him and «Otto Premnger» conversation film «out» director, and who told him that the draft of the first film were not adept enough, replied Trumbo that very adroit in all watch the scenario will become very boring; the multiplicity Dhiroath and a surfeit of intellectual and artistic dose, then Premnger told him that all he has is to write every scene brilliantly and will who shall take it out incorrectly mascot of weariness.
It remains for us to mention that Trumbo scenarios were often carry many projections Chi political orientations, here are the biggest manipulation practiced by the film with us and is a backdoor comes, it is clear that «Spartacus» -oho slave story, who led a rebellion against the Men- had intended to position personally interface on ground; where it was clearly evident in the famous movie scene in which all the slaves rose up to do to protect the commander of their insurgency, shouting in defiance «I am Spartacus! I am Spartacus! », And in this scene is a reference to the feeble position taken by friends Trumbo and built his career, when he had need of them to the servo and solidarity during the ordeal, as that phrase did not mention history never did you list the novel inferred also of the film, but Trumbo added events as seemed those cry like a truer artistic moment in his career.
In the end we are in front of a movie highly distinguished, it is true that it is not a technical Balthvh but derives its significance from the monitor to the era of time Hollywood teamed up with with Washington to Thaola anxiously Rated mock trials for those who disagreed with opinion and political belief, viscous any rebel in the concentration camps and to prevent him from expressing this opinion forever.
Storyline
In 1947, Dalton Trumbo (Bryan Cranston) was Hollywood's top screenwriter until he and other artists were jailed and blacklisted for their political beliefs. TRUMBO (directed by Jay Roach) recounts how Dalton used words and wit to win two Academy Awards and expose the absurdity and injustice under the blacklist, which entangled everyone from gossip columnist Hedda Hopper (Helen Mirren) to John Wayne, Kirk Douglas and Otto Preminger . Written by Bleecker Street
I've seen some mixed reviews of Trumbo, and in a way I can understand why it would not impress some film critics. It is a movie where the movie business, and especially movie personalities, are given over to actors to play. It's not unlike a few years ago with the Anthony Hopkins Hitchcock: you got a big cast and they all have roles to play from people who, if you're a big movie buff (or even someone who just knows who Kirk Douglas or John Wayne were, and that's probably a lot, whether or not you know who Dalton Trumbo was entirely), there's an aspect of 'Oh, he's or she is playing HIM or HER!' But I think with a sharp enough script that sort of thing goes by the way-side, especially if it gives the right actors some good stuff to play. There's nothing about Trumbo that is especially complex, as it has the message that most of us in 2015 would agree with: the Hollywood Blacklist, not just what happened to the Hollywood 10 but many others, was a horrible thing, and the thesis comes down to the idea that there were good and bad people in it but it also came down to the nature of it all making people victims ... well, except for Hedda Hopper.
The movie is fun though whether or not you know a lot about the history because of who is in the cast and especially Bryan Cranston as Trumbo. He's a man who makes a lot of money in the 40's in Hollywood writing scripts and yet is an avowed Communist (he makes the case to his daughter in such a way early on in the film that some might question but most of us would go ' huh, that's it then '). A lot of the conflict comes because of what the history had right there: HUAC went after people in Hollywood who were suspected 'traitors', but in reality were just writers and (some) actors and directors who had affiliations with the party, and thanks to pressure by columnist Hedda Hopper (played here by Helen Mirren in a role that's deliciously evil) and John Wayne (actor I can not remember but does a good impression without being caricature-ish), a group got pressured. They did not name names, were held in contempt of court, found guilty and did time. Well, unless if you were Edward G. Robinson (though he's shown in a somewhat sympathetic light, maybe just by Michael Stuhlbarg being in the role).
The bulk of the story is about the 'front' that Trumbo led for himself and other blacklisted writers such as stubborn / cancer-ridden Arlen Hird (Louis CK, always a pleasure to watch, but especially in scenes with Cranston). They used fake names to get their scripts made, even as they had no choice for a while but to team up with filmmakers who were out to just make "crap" (an echo in a way for me of Burton's Ed Wood with the John Goodman character). There's some predictable drama that unfolds - the all-business-all-writing part of Dalton that conflicts with being a father and family-man and clashing with his daughter and wife (very good Elle Fanning and Diane Lane respectively) - but what helps it along all the way is just a sharp script and direction that keeps things thematically strong.
This is serious stuff what happened to these people in Hollywood, and director Jay Roach and writer John McNamara know that, all the way up to a final speech from Trumbo upon winning a WGA award that puts things into a perspective that (almost) makes Trumbo too fair to those who really wronged him and his friends. But it's just full of wit an clever lines; if you're a sucker for that, as I can be sometimes, then Trumbo makes for a balance of the light and dark stuff. Again if nothing else, Cranston makes someone who can easily be seen as a CHARACTER in bold letters (and by many accounts that is who Trumbo was) and gives him three dimensions and perspective on the situations that unfold. He does things that may be wrong and provocative, in both bad and good ways, and is told off enough that any of his short-comings become kind of charming. I could've spent more time with his Trumbo and been happy, especially in light of the history that unfolds here (i.e. Roman Holiday, Spatacus, Exodus, other productions like The Brave One).
Trumbo is a 2015 American biographical drama film directed by Jay Roach and written by John McNamara. The film stars Bryan Cranston, Diane Lane, Helen Mirren, Louis C.K., Elle Fanning, John Goodman and Michael Stuhlbarg. The film follows the life of Hollywood screenwriter Dalton Trumbo and is based on the biography Dalton Trumbo by Bruce Alexander Cook. [4]
The film was shown in the Special Presentations section of the 2015 Toronto International Film Festival on September 12, 2015, [5] and was released on November 6, 2015, by Bleecker Street. The film has received generally positive reviews, with lead actor Bryan Cranston nominated for several awards, including the Academy Award for Best Actor. [6] [7] However, the film has also been criticized for historical inaccuracies and misportrayals of important people and events . [8] [9] [10]
Dalton Trumbo (Bryan Cranston) is a screenwriter whose talent places him among the elite of Hollywood. However, his active membership in the Communist Party of the USA draws the contempt of staunchly anti-Soviet entertainment-industry figures such as columnist Hedda Hopper (Helen Mirren) and actor John Wayne (David James Elliott).
Trumbo is one of 10 screenwriters subpoenaed to testify before the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) regarding alleged Communist propaganda in Hollywood films. They refuse to directly answer questions, confident that a liberal majority on the Supreme Court will overturn the convictions for contempt of Congress. Trumbo's friend Edward G. Robinson (Michael Stuhlbarg), who supports the cause, sells the Portrait of Père Tanguy to raise money for their legal defense fund.
The unexpected death of Justice Wiley Rutledge ruins Trumbo's plan to appeal to the Supreme Court. In 1950, Trumbo serves 11 months in Texarkana prison, where he meets former HUAC chairman J. Parnell Thomas, who was convicted of tax evasion. [11]
As the Hollywood Blacklist expands to exclude more communists and communist sympathizers from working in the industry, Trumbo and his comrades are abandoned by Robinson and producer Buddy Ross (Roger Bart), who disavow them to protect their careers. Trumbo is released from prison, but he remains blacklisted and his finances - and family life - become increasingly strained. He resorts to giving the screenplay for Roman Holiday to his friend Ian McLellan Hunter (Alan Tudyk), to take credit and a share of the money, and eventually the Academy Award for Best Story. Selling his idyllic lakeside home and moving to a house in the city, he goes to work as a pseudonymous screenwriter for the low-budget King Brothers Productions, also farming out the writing of B-movie screenplays to fellow blacklisted writers. He puts his wife Cleo (Diane Lane) and teenage children to work as his support staff, adding to domestic conflict. King Brothers' film The Brave One, an original story by Trumbo under a pseudonym, receives an Academy Award he can not claim. His blacklisted friend Arlen Hird (Louis C.K.) dies, destitute, but an attempt by Hopper's allies to intimidate the head of King Brothers to fire Trumbo fails completely.
Over time, industry suspicion of Trumbo's ghostwriting develops, but he is careful not to confirm it. In 1960, actor Kirk Douglas (Dean O'Gorman) recruits him to write the screenplay for his epic film Spartacus, and director Otto Preminger (Christian Berkel) recruits him to script Exodus for him; both publicly credit Trumbo as the screenwriter despite Hopper's futile efforts to intimidate Douglas into dropping Trumbo. By 1960, the effectiveness of the Blacklist has been broken to the point where newly elected US President John F. Kennedy publicly endorses Spartacus and Trumbo and others are able to begin rebuilding their careers. Ten years later, finally receiving his due accolades from Hollywood, Trumbo speaks about how the Blacklist victimized them all: those who stood by their principles and lost their jobs, and also those who compromised their principles to keep them.
Production [edit]
On September 18, 2013, Bryan Cranston joined the cast to play Dalton Trumbo. [13] On April 14, 2014, Helen Mirren joined the cast to play Hedda Hopper. [14] On August 7, 2014, Diane Lane, Elle Fanning, John Goodman and Michael Stuhlbarg joined the cast. [15] On August 13, 2014, David James Elliott, Peter Mackenzie and Roger Bart joined the cast to play John Wayne, Robert Kenny and Buddy Ross, respectively. On september 6, 2014, Louis CK joined the cast to play Arlen Hird. On September 22, 2014, Dean O'Gorman joined the cast to play Kirk Douglas. On October 16, 2014, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje joined the cast to play Virgil Brooks. [20] Principal photography began on September 15, 2014, and ended on November 6, 2014. [22]
Release [edit]
On August 13, 2014, it was announced that Bleecker Street would distribute the film. The film had its world premiere at the 2015 Toronto International Film Festival on September 12, 2015. [1] The film had a limited release on November 6, 2015 before going wide on November 25. ]
Reception [edit]
Critical response [edit]
Trumbo has received generally positive reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a rating of 74%, based on 144 reviews, with an average rating of 6.7 / 10. The site's critical consensus states, "Trumbo serves as an honorable and well-acted tribute to a brilliant writer's principled stand, even if it does not quite achieve the greatness of its subject's own classic screenplays." Metacritic gives the film a score of 60 out of 100, based on reviews from 33 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews
Peter Debruge of Variety gave the film a positive review, saying "Trumbo may be clumsy and overly simplistic at times, but it's still an important reminder of how democracy can fail (that is, when a fervent majority turns on those with different and potentially threatening values), and the strength of character it takes to fight the system. Lou Lumenick of the New York Post gave the film three and a half stars out of four, saying" it's a cracking good story, and Cranston does a great job portraying a man who made great sacrifices for his principles. "] Manohla Dargis of The New York Times gave the film a negative review, saying" Part biopic, part historical gloss, Trumbo tells a great-man story with a patchwork of fact and fiction, mixing in the odd bit of newsreel with a great many dull, visually flat and poorly lighted dramatic scenes. " Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle gave the film three out of four stars, saying" Trumbo is breezy and pithy without ever undercutting the seriousness of the subject. A certain degree of wit is appropriate in a writer's story, just as any Hollywood tale must at least have a whiff of absurdity, or else it can not be true. "[30] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three out of four stars, saying "Trumbo is a corny, well-made B-movie about an A-list screenwriter who had to take jobs writing B-movies after he was blacklisted, but eventually worked his way back to writing A-movies with Kirk Douglas aka Spartacus as his champion. ]
Jordan Mintzer of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a positive review, saying "What makes the movie work are the lively performances, both from the supporting cast and from Cranston, who sheds the mimicry and pontificating of earlier scenes to turn Trumbo into a wry, self-deprecating and somewhat cheeky older man, even if he continued to stand up for what was right. "[1] Ty Burr of The Boston Globe gave the film three out of four stars, saying" Cranston's performance is the motor that runs Trumbo , and that motor never idles, never flags in momentum or magnetism or idealistic scorn. "[32] Alonso Duralde of TheWrap gave the film a positive review, saying" Roach and McNamara fall victim to the occasional phony biopic moment or straight-up moment of didacticism, but overall Trumbo is a lively history about the day-in-day-out drudgery of survival during oppressive times. Screenwriters are so rarely taken seriously by the film industry that it's a nice switch to watch them be the heroes. "[ 33] Bill Goodykoontz of The Arizona Republic gave the film three and a half stars out of four, saying "Roach's film may be light in places, even sugarcoated in others, but any reminder of the past and its impact on the future is a welcome one. Plus, we get a good Cranston performance in the bargain
Despite generally positive reviews, several critics attacked the film for being historically misleading or for ideological reasons. Godfrey Cheshire of the Roger Ebert Journal wrote that Trumbo is "another of those simplistic, made-to-order films about the Hollywood blacklist in which the blacklisted movie folks are all innocent, in every conceivable way." Cheshire decried the film's insinuation that Joseph McCarthy and the House Committee on Un-American Activities created the Hollywood blacklist. In reality, the blacklist was created by Hollywood studio chiefs. Cheshire also wrote that the film defended international communism: "it invites us to the see the Communist Party USA as just another political party rather than as the domestic instrument of a hostile and ultra-murderous foreign tyranny."
Other critics raised similar historical concerns. While the film portrays Trumbo as "a New Deal liberal hero defending civil liberties", Ron Capshaw explained how the real Trumbo was an outspoken supporter of Soviet-style communism, including the brutal regimes of Joseph Stalin and North Korean dictator Kim Il-sung. The conservative Pat Buchanan questioned the appropriateness of portraying Trumbo as a "martyr to the first amendment" while overlooking his support for regimes that actively suppress free speech. Armond White of the National Review went a step further, accusing director jay Roach of "unrestrained partisanship" for whitewashing the dark history of communist ideologies to invent a hero that supports Roach's political views.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire